Second European Symposium on Biochemical Engineering Science

Evaluation report (n = 78; 21,5% Industry; 84% Academy)

What is your overall impression of ESBES-2
1 = poor, 5 = excellent

1 = 0%
2 = 1%
3 = 6%
4 = 62%
5 = 27%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is your opinion about:

(a) Symposium Programme
1 = 0%
2 = 1%
3 = 23%
4 = 55%
5 = 14%

(b) Quality
1 = 0%
2 = 1%
3 = 21%
4 = 62%
5 = 12%

C) Was the programme well balanced
1 = 1%
2 = 13%
3 = 28%
4 = 33%
5 = 15%

(d) Are we sufficiently bridging engineering and biology
1 = 1%
2 = 6%
3 = 25%
4 = 42%
5 = 16,5%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the programme was,
Too little of:

DSP = 14%
BE = 11,5%
BT (for ind.) = 5%

Too much of:
Fermentation/Biol. (mol) = 6,4%
Politics = 5%
Food engineering = 3,8%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scientific Presentations
Please list up to 3 presentations which particularly interested you
The three best:
1. Enfors: 24%
2. Bowen: 11%
3. Neeser/Wurm: 15%

The three less relevant:
1. Silva: 14%
2. Hansen/Reed: 9%
3. Marcos/Reis/Hasal: 6,4%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is your opinion about:
(c) Poster previews
1 = 15%
2 = 26%
3 = 24%
4 = 20%
5 = 3,5%

(d) Poster sessions
1 =1%
2 = 2,5%
3 = 11,5%
4 = 64%
5 = 14%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments on poster previews/poster sessions:
Previews provided no usefull information: 21%
Posters less satisfying: 11,5%
Posters fascinating/excellent: 11,5%
Topics did not fit in the content of posters: 6%
Poster sessions quite short: 6%
Poster sessions little confusing: 2,5%
Too dark in the room: 2,5%
Poster session time allocation good: 4,5%
Big variety in quality and appearance: 1%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Organisation of ESBES-2

a) Before the symposium
1 = -
2 = -
3 = 10%
4 = 24%
5 = 58%

(b) During
1 = -
2 = -
3 = 1%
4 = 19%
5 = 75%

(c) Facilities
1 = -
2 = 2,5%
3 = 23%
4 = 33%
5 = 35%

(d) Accommodation
1 = -
2 = -
3 = 6,4%
4 = 25%
5 = 28%

(e) Lunches
1 = -
2 = -
3 = 38%
4 = 28%
5 = 65%

(f) Social event
1 = -
2 = 1%
3 = 2,5%
4 = 16%
5 = 67%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:

Congratulations: 14%
Very well: 10%
Perfect/excellent: 9%
Fantastic hospitality: 3,8%
Wonderful balance science-social: 2,5%